We should all be writing him letters of support folks. The man is completely innocent, and he does not belong in prison. You can write him at the following address. Hopefully he’ll be out soon!
EDGAR JAMES STEELE 14226-023
USP VICTORVILLE
U.S. PENITENTIARY
P.O. BOX 3900
ADELANTO, CA 92301
When they can lock up an honourable man like Edgar, then none of us is safe, they can fabricate any bullshit and lock us up. Its imperative we unite,, Muslim and Christian alike to get Edgar out of jail. The Jew controlled FBI totally stitched him up because he was getting close to revealing a Florida based Jew run Russian mafia, Russian bride scam, that is why they locked him up! The Jewish mafia did this to him and they control the FBI!
Sorry Jane, Keith and Rich, but I have to respectfully disagree,
Is Edgar Steel guilty of what they say? I highly doubt it. Is he an “honorable man” that is innocent of everything? I highly doubt that too. Frankly, he was a successful lawyer in the Jew S of A. To me, that about says it all. A lawyer in this country is basically a Jew. I don’t believe it is as bad in other countries, but here, this is the case.
Years ago when I was much younger and much more naive, I would entertain the claim made by many that “not all lawyers are bad.” That may be true, but I have now had the displeasure of knowing many personally and receiving services from a few, and I would say that in our country, the “honest” lawyers are probably 1 in 10,000 and they are probably all in pro-bono work or working as public defenders.
I watched all the segments of this interview. There are a few red flags in Steel’s claims and behavior that stick out immediately.
First, he repeatedly expresses his shock and dismay at the dirty tactics that the government has used on him. Come on man…..this is coming from a guy that has represented enemy number one of ZOG….the Aryan Nations. That just isn’t believable in the least. He should be stating that he was very familiar with how the government will play with people of his political slant. I’m sure he could write the book on it.
Second, he states that he confided in his handy-man about his political situation and as to where his silver was stashed. Shit, I, like you guys here on this blog am a dissident of the same orientation as Steel but without even one percent of his profile and exposure and even I wouldn’t tell a “handyman” what my beliefs are or where I had my wealth hidden. Is a high-profile dissident lawyer with an internationally read blog that has the ADL on his ass as well as the whole establishment that dense? I don’t think so. What the really happened between him and the handyman, I can’t say, but his take on it just doesn’t hold water. Sorry.
Third, he states that his wife first believed the FBI when they came to her because “no one would want to believe that their government is this corrupt”. This is the same reason in part that he gave as to why the jury convicted him so quickly. Let’s look at this. This woman, Cindy, has been married to him for almost 30 years and he is an open white nationalist that advocates for the cause. He even states in the interview that he had been receiving death threats at the time of his arrest. I am sure that he has been super vigilant for a hell of a long time….at least since he represented the AN. And I am sure most of his vigilance has been towards the feds. If you are the wife of a high profile guy like this that has been in this for years with you at his side, the first reaction if the feds came with some story would be, “Fuck off assholes”. Your reaction would be that of Randy Weaver ‘s wife who would probably would have shot a fed before talking to one.
Fourth, he first let a public defender represent him and then during his trial it appears that he let another lawyer talk him out of getting on the stand. Once again, this guy is a fucking high profile lawyer that has been going head to head with the establishment for years. When he is talking about this, he once again seems to express dismay at what has been happening and how corrupt it is. Give me a fucking break, none of this is news to him at all. If all of this was completely trumped up and with him being a successful lawyer that should be an expert in the corruption of ZOG, he should have been chomping at the bit to represent himself and take the stand in his own defense. He says something like, “I just couldn’t trust myself” as to why he didn’t represent himself. That might have been an admission, like, “I know I have been a backsliding kike-ass lawyer my whole life that doesn’t even remember when he lies anymore, so I thought it be best if I get another liar in here for me.”
Fifth, as I said above, he seems to state that part of the reason he was found guilty so quickly is that people just don’t want to believe that the government is that criminal. I know that he also spoke about his lack of defense, but he also eluded to this when he spoke of the jury believing everything that a cop would say on the stand. In today’s America, especially in north Idaho, do you think that the people believe the “official story” all the time? I don’t think so man….there are a ton of people, although they may not be Jew-wise and rather brain dead, that don’t like cops in the least and know that shit is corrupt. Shit, it is pretty consistent now that in polls about 70% or more Americans don’t believe the official story on 911. He even said it himself that he went to north Idaho because he was aware of the corruption in the country and wanted to get away from it just like the others up there. There is a heavy suspicion of federal authority in north Idaho. That is why the Aryan Nations does their thing up there. That is why there are so many up there like Randy Weaver. Steel is talking like his jury pool was pulled from Seattle liberals.
Finally, I know it isn’t the best source, but there is something stated on his Wikipedia page that if true, I would say the guy is a scum bag. I know that Wikipedia is biased and slanted, but I can’t imagine that with a case as high profile as his that they would risk outlandish fabrication to the extent of what is on his page. That wouldn’t do them any service at all. His Wikipedia page says that it came out in his trial that he had sent some 14,000 emails to women in the Ukraine in 2010, with women receiving up to 10 letters and 100 texts each. There is even a partial transcript of the body of a “love letter” to a supposed Ukrainian girlfriend that is named, and this letter is said to have been sent while he was in prison awaiting trial. It then states that this letter was introduced as evidence without even an objection from Steel. Let’s say he still had a public defender that wasn’t worth a shit so he didn’t object. But Steel himself is a lawyer…..he couldn’t stop the shit, dismiss his lawyer, and object himself? Is it possible that all that shit about Ukrainian women on Wikipedia is completely made up and didn’t happen? Cause if that is the case, I haven’t heard Steel or anyone defending him say anything about it. Wikipedia could choose a lot of details to publish about his case, but they put that one, and if it isn’t true, that is a horrendous lie, and I would be all over it if I were Steel. That shit is on his Wikipedia page that will be read by thousands. Steel and the others talk about this handyman that was liar, they talk about the false recordings, but I haven’t heard anyone mention this shit with 14,000 letters to bitches in the Ukraine. Why? If that was presented in court and then put on Wikipedia, that would be the first and by far most obvious and easy to prove to be fraud if it had been fabricated by the prosecution. Cause I gotta say, if I were on the jury, I may have my doubts about all of the rest of the shit, but if they got to a part where they showed me without objection from the defense that the accused had sent 14,000 letters to chicks in the Ukraine and was writing love letters to one of them from jail while this guy was accused of trying to kill his wife, I would probably decide pretty quickly that this defendant was a scum bag just based on that. Is this why Steel is so upset in this interview that the prosecution was reading his mail? Well, that looks like a scumbag lawyer. He doesn’t want the prosecution to read his mail cause he is up to no good. I would let them read and see whatever the fuck they wanted if I was innocent. Period. Honest men don’t need to hide their actions when defending themselves from defamation.
One more thing. It has been revealed to me that in this country under ZOG, you can only become wealthy and keep your integrity if you are a private business person that produces something, and even then your chances are slim. I mean working a trade more or less. Becoming a wealthy white collar professional in this country almost always means you have sold out on some level and fucked its citizens at the behest of the Jews. Becoming a wealthy mechanic that worked your way into owning 10 shops by knowing your trade is a different thing. Steel, from what I could gather, was pretty wealthy, perhaps still is. Even in his interview he is talking about his silver buried around different spots on his property around different buildings. His Wikipedia page talks about him potentially giving the horse ranch in Idaho to his wife in the case of an “almost divorce” in 2000. The humble, honest, hardworking man doesn’t have precious metals buried around their expansive properties….but I know of a lot of kike-like lawyers that would! And they get this wealth by fleecing others….it is stolen. I wondered what he cost the Aryan Nations? I believed they were bankrupted in that case, but it is said it was due to the multi-million dollar judgment against them. Probably, but I’ll betchya that ole Steel did work for minimum….LOL. Let’s put it this way….how many of you reading this have buried treasure in several spots on your multi-acre horse ranch estate?
So I can’t say what happened or what didn’t, but I will say this. I don’t have a lot of sympathy for anyone that gets fat as a lawyer in this Talmudic system and then ends up getting burnt by it. Furthermore as I have already outlined, there are way too many issues with this case and Steel’s behavior for me to lose much sleep over it.
Oh, Wikipedia says that Duke came to his defense during his trial. Another red flag….Duke is a professional activist, nothing more. He is a fraud.
Aservant, with all due respect man…
Wikipedia is clearly a Jew front and a Jew operation used to distort the facts and flat out publish lies! Wikipedia… by their own words “can be edited by anyone.”
Just go and read the drivel they’ve posted about Matt Hale, who is also completely innocent!
FROM WIKIPEDIA: “After Smith’s shooting spree, Hale appeared on television and in newspapers saying, “We do urge hatred. If you love something, you must be willing to hate that which threatens it.”[citation needed] He also referred to non-whites as “mud races.” According to Hale, America should only be occupied by whites.[citation needed] During a television interview that summer, Hale stated that his church didn’t condone violent or illegal activities.”
That implies that Matt essentially ordered his members to commit acts of terrorism.
FROM WIKIPEDIA: In late 2002 Hale filed a class action lawsuit against Judge Joan Lefkow, the United States district court judge presiding over his trademark case. Again in late 2002 and prior to his arrest, Hale denounced Lefkow in a news conference, claiming that she was biased against him because she was married to a Jewish man and had grandchildren who were biracial.On January 8, 2003, Hale was arrested, charged with soliciting an undercover FBI informant to kill Lefkow. On February 28, 2005, Lefkow’s mother and husband were murdered at her home on Chicago’s North Side. Chicago Police revealed on March 10 that Bart Ross, a plaintiff in a medical malpractice case that Lefkow had dismissed, admitted to the murders in a suicide note written before shooting himself during a routine traffic stop in Wisconsin the previous evening. The murders and suicide had no connection to Hale or Creativity. On April 6, 2005, Hale was sentenced to a 40-year prison term for his conviction for attempting to solicit the murder of Lefkow.
The way this is worded also clearly implicates that Hale ordered the murder. Which is utter bullshit.
Thanks for the respect back. Glad you didn’t take my comments as a slight towards you guys, cause they aren’t. I felt the need to comment in detail because I have often seen these “rallying cries” to support “one of our own” and I think everyone needs to be very careful in these cases. What I was really just saying is that I have way too much doubt to throw my weight behind Steel in this case. Not that I really have any weight in the movement to give him….LOL
But to continue the discussion….
Yes, I know, and I said it in my post, that Wikipedia isn’t a good source. But I also said that although I know they are biased, I don’t think they would outright fabricate info in high profile cases such as these. Slant their summary, yes….exaggerate, yes…. Your response confirms this. Actually, I don’t take from the Wikipedia post on Matt Hale that they phrased it to make him look guilty. In fact, I was very surprised that they mentioned that the murders and suicide had no connection to Hale or Creativity. To me honestly, that post on Matt Hale seemed to be quite unusually objective considering it is on Wikipedia. In that case, just like Steel’s case, someone needs to show that Hale didn’t solicit murder, plain and simple. From reading the Wikipedia summary that you posted, as I already said, it doesn’t say he got the time for the deaths that are described. It says he got time for solicitation of murder of the judge. And I am not sure, but I am assuming that where it says on the post in brackets “citation needed” if you added that or if it came off the page. But I will say that I saw his interviews and from what I remember, that is what he said. I am going to say more on Hale later.
But back to Steel. I brought up many points in my post outside of what was claimed by Wikipedia but you didn’t address any of them. I already stated that I wouldn’t take what Wikipedia says at face value, but just the fact that this info is out there and Steel or none of his legal team or supporters are addressing this claim seems to be very funny at the least. If they don’t know that info is out there, then they are so fucking incompetent that they deserve what they get. Sorry, that may sound harsh, but we are in harsh days. I will repeat as I said before. If it was presented in court, or even if it is being claimed in public (Wikipedia is more or less claiming something in public)that 14,000 letters were sent to bitches in the Ukraine while he was married and that he even sent one a love letter while in jail, he has got to address it. If it happened but it was due to an investigation that he was conducting, as claimed Jane Doe, then he needs to say that and explain the reasons why. He had a whole interview and I didn’t hear one word on this matter, not one. If it didn’t happen, then he needs to say that this is a public fabrication, and that in itself would cast a lot of doubt on the whole case. He could then prove Jew influence in Wikipedia, prove ADL harassment against him and that could plant huge doubt in a lot of people’s minds in the case. I’m sure that many people would say, “If they are posting shit in public that didn’t even happen in court, what else have they made up about him?”
I know people will say that he can’t say certain things because it may hamper his case. Well, if you think that, you are guilty for the shithole of a society that we live in. This is what the Jew counts on; making stupid rules and scaring us into obeying them to our own detriment. If Steel thinks this way, then he is fucking gone mentally. If he is innocent and just has been set up, and the courts had just found him guilty at the time of this interview, looking at 60 years (he got 50, right?), what the fuck does he have to lose? Take your case to the public man! There has been many, many times that details about a case have gotten to the public that has stopped prosecution for fear of public outcry.
I can’t believe that with this info about the Ukrainian women out there, true or not, exaggerated or not, he and none of his supporters will address it. That makes him look guilty as fuck. If there is a reason for it, like I said before, explain it, and explain it in detail. If the court won’t let you present that evidence, post it on the internet. He has lots of supporters with websites. If you guys are saying that he is innocent, why don’t you address it? You only addressed that Wikipedia is a shitty Jew source. Well, I agree. So what is your position? That info is a complete fabrication? Just saying that the source is no good isn’t a solid argument. Show that the source is no good. Get the court transcripts, they are public record, and post them on your site. Show that it was completely made up that Steel’s lawyer didn’t object to the love letter he wrote from prison, like it says on Wikipedia. Show that he didn’t send letters to 14,000 women in the Ukraine, that this is a lie. That can be shown by the court transcripts through cross examination as to if it were proven or if it is just hearsay. And if this did happen, show that it was part of a valid investigation into corruption of a dating service and prove it. This shouldn’t be hard. Maybe a lot of reading, but it shouldn’t be hard if that was in fact what was going on. Show that the love letter is a fake. If you can at least show me that, I will start to be convinced that he may have a case. I already said, I don’t know what the fuck really happened, but I just have a hard time believing so many things about Steel’s version of events. And sorry, like I said, without exception, every lawyer I have ever known is a complete, lying, Jew scumbag. I know there are exceptions and Steel could be one of them. But I haven’t seen anything to show me otherwise. I don’t know the man and wasn’t at the trial. Are we brothers because he names the Jew? Farrakhan names the Jew as well…. and fuck him.
It often seems that many times in the “movement” that many want to jump behind someone that names the Jew when he gets into trouble just because he names the Jew. Or maybe because he is pro-white. Or maybe both. Well, I don’t think this is a wise thing to do. Just because you name the Jew doesn’t mean you can’t be corrupt.
This brings me back to Hale. I know very little of his case, but I wouldn’t doubt that he has been thrown under the bus as well. At the very least, even if he is guilty of solicitation, he probably got a sentence way too harsh when compared with others. But even assuming that this is the case, this won’t lead me to say that he is “completely innocent”. I don’t know the man, wasn’t at the trial, and I haven’t read the transcripts. If someone shows me evidence to the contrary I will change my position. In the meantime, I don’t wish him harm. But I am not rallying to his side, sending money and letters in his defense without really knowing all the facts to determine his character and his level of guilt.
But beyond all of this, what are guys like him and Steel doing to beat the Jew? That is the goal……at least it is mine. Why get on national TV, like Hale did, just so you can be made a target of? “To get the word out”, people will say. Well, I know that we are in agreement on this point; the country is fucking gone. Pleading to the mainstream will just get a bull’s eye on your back, nothing more. If people can’t see this, sorry, I say fuck em, we are better off without them. Frankly, I think that people in the movement that are being activists to the masses just want to be popular and cool. Or they want donations or they want to sell books, like Duke. We have the internet, there are a lot of ways to get your message to the like minded and those are the only ones that will count To convert, you can speak to people that you know personally. I do it all the time and have had great success.
The same can be said for Steel as for Hale. Acquiring extensive properties and hiring untrusted handy men to build stashes for your silver is just fucking stupidity. We live under ZOG and we are in their cross hairs. This is the time to keep your head down and have a very low profile. This is a time to get your personal shit in order, get the fuck out of the banks, get some property perhaps, open small businesses that network with others in the movement, home school your kids about the truth, mentor others kids so they can know the truth, learn a trade, skill, learn another, then another, etc…..the examples are endless. Debating some Jew cocksucker on MSNBC or acquiring horse ranches while taking legal cases at $150 per hour is what the Jew does.
Thanks guys for letting me state my position. Honestly, I would love for you guys to prove me wrong and say I didn’t have all the facts. But this shit is serious and I need to see details before I will plead for a new trial.
Aservant,
I have looked into this story in more depth than just this video. Look up the RBN archives he and his wife have done with Rick Adams, Deanna Spingola etc and you will find the whole story is fabricated with the FBI using voice morphing to fake his voice, his wife knew full well of his investigations with the girls and all who knew him would tell you that he loved his wife too much to ever want to kill her and certainly not arrange it from his hospital bed using a FBI informant who robbed his house. I say honourable because none of us is a Saint and overall he did a lot to defend people whom the government was trying to stitch up and if 1:10K lawyers are good then he is one of those 1 in 10K. In any case, he is certainly innocent and the FBI clearly stitched him up even failing to provide adequate evidence in court and then claiming they had lost tapes etc. All totally incradulous.
Jane Doe,
I most definitely will look into this in great detail. It isn’t the first time I have heard of his case, but I haven’t looked into it, and this was the first time that I had heard anything on it “straight from the horse’s mouth”. I will repeat that I’m not saying he is guilty, I just have a lot of doubts as to exactly what of and to what level. In all honesty, his interview for me just didn’t pass the “smell test”. I have learned to trust my gut in cases like this. When I was younger I didn’t and it burned me every time.
A good example was when he was asked about his wife. In this response, as in many throughout the interview, I saw “smooth lawyer talk”. “My wife?”, he says,” She’s my best buddy, my lover, my friend….”, etc., with a very sentimental, mushy demeanor and a big smile. That’s not verbatim of course. But it just seemed over the top. I just think that someone that is in the battle of his life in a case like this who is sincere would answer more like, “Well, she has been through hell and back like me and not doing to good seeming that her husband will probably die in prison”. Or maybe, “You know, she has been brought into this as a pawn too many times I don’t want to do it again so let’s not talk about her, let’s talk about my case and the details. All I will say is that she supports me and you should interview her as well”. To me that would have been a lot more credible. The way he phrased it sounded more like a desperate attempt to convince that it wasn’t possible that he could ever have ill will towards her cause all is just perfect between them. Like I said, it was over the top in my opinion and didn’t seem sincere.
“I haven’t lost even one friend over this case” was another one that he stated. Maybe true, but I have learned that when people try to appeal too much to the sentimental side to prove factual cases it is usually because the facts aren’t too heavy on their side. This claim of his is something that can’t be proven and this is a very common liberal tactic to manipulate people to feel for you rather than assess a case on its merit. Once again, in place of these claims, the case of the letters and accusations of romance with Ukrainian women would have been much better to address to convince people. Even if the interviewer would have cut him off so it showed bias, like “don’t bother me with facts please”, or even if he said that this activity with these women was due to an investigation but he couldn’t go into the details for fear of consequences, that would have been a lot to at least address the issue instead of sentimental pleas to “get people on his side”. Remember, this is an experienced trial lawyer, not some joe blow schumk that doesn’t know how to debate. Well, supposedly….I am giving him the benefit of the doubt.
Just a couple of more thoughts, but I will look into it like you have suggested. I really want to see what it said in detail about the Ukrainian women angle.
Yeh look into it. The Jewish sex trade is huge worldwide and this is the real reason they went after him, too many big bucks at stake!
I watched the video and the 2nd part cuts off around the 50 second mark. Maybe he was talking about the Ukrainian letters and Jew Tube cut him off? Seems suspect.